R.C.P. No. 152/2023

Case between Dr. K.V. Venugopalan vs Mr. K.K. Abdu Rahiman regarding rent control petition

Court

COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR

Order Date

2024-12-06

Duration

approximately-1 year 1 month

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a landlord, Dr. K.V. Venugopalan, and a tenant, Mr. K.K. Abdu Rahiman, concerning the compliance of a rent control order. The respondent failed to comply with the previous order, leading to the landlord's petition for possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The respondent was found to have not complied with the rent control order, and the court has directed the respondent to vacate the premises.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Order to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The respondent was found to have not complied with the rent control order, and the court has directed the respondent to vacate the premises.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not show sufficient cause for their default.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not show sufficient cause for their default.

Supporting Evidence

The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 02/2023 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence under Section 12(3) of the Act.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Dr. K.V. Venugopalan
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mr. K.K. Abdu Rahiman
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: C.S. Yesudas
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.M. Nasarudheen
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Abdul Khader T.S.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification