Case Summary
The petitioners Dr. Krishnan H H, Saritha T Krishnan, and M Harshan filed a rent control petition against the respondent Jewel Joseph for non-compliance with a previous order related to rent arrears. The respondent did not appear in court despite multiple adjournments.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner put in possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises due to non-compliance with previous orders regarding rent arrears. The respondent's absence led to the court's decision to stop proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court order and did not provide sufficient cause for the non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the court order and did not provide sufficient cause for the non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court order and did not provide sufficient cause for the non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the court order and did not provide sufficient cause for the non-compliance.
Supporting Evidence
The tenant becomes fully aware that unless sufficient cause has been shown for default committed, the consequence of stoppage of the proceedings and direction to put the landlord in possession would follow automatically.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. Krishnan H H
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saritha T Krishnan
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M Harshan
- Party Age
- 79
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jewel Joseph
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non-compliance filed by petitioners
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amrin Fathima
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Sajeevan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sincey A.H.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.A. Abdul Nistar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B. Radhakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.S. Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Libin Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Evidence:
Hence an order passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. Krishnan H H et al vs Jewel Joseph regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. Krishnan H H et al vs Jewel Joseph regarding rent control