Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 02/2023

Case between Dr. C.G. Balakrishnan vs E.M. Abdul Rahman regarding compliance of rent arrears

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-12-03
Duration
approximately-2 months 12 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. C.G. Balakrishnan filed a rent control petition against E.M. Abdul Rahman concerning the non-compliance of a court order related to rent arrears. The respondent consistently failed to appear and comply with the court's directives.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the earlier court order regarding rent payments. Consequently, the court directed the respondent to vacate the premises in favor of the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent's continuous absence and failure to comply with the court's order warranted the judgment in favor of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dr. C.G. Balakrishnan (70 years years) Chinganazhath House, V.R. Menon Road Kochi - 682 016.

Defendants

E.M. Abdul Rahman (72 years years) M/s. Diamond Info Tech, 39/3738, 1st Floor, Aysha Manzil, Ravipuram Kochi-682016.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases