Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 369 OF 2013

Case between Devaki Amma, Sadasivan, Sadanandan, Sunanda vs Mangat Devaki Amma, Premanandan, Sunil regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri.JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-06-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Devaki Amma and her children Sadasivan, Sadanandan, and Sunanda against defendants Mangat Devaki Amma, Premanandan, and Sunil regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed with costs as the plaintiff was absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent during the hearing and set exparte. The court noted the absence of the counsel for the plaintiffs as well.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent during the hearing and set exparte. The court noted the absence of the counsel for the plaintiffs as well.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were absent and counsel reported no instruction.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were absent and counsel reported no instruction.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff absent, name called and set exparte.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devaki Amma
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sadasivan
Party Age
51
Relation
Child
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sadanandan
Party Age
48
Relation
Child
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunanda
Party Age
46
Relation
Child
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mangat Devaki Amma
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Premanandan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunil
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.K.Beena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K. Vipin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for Injunction was dismissed.
Evidence:
IA 941/19 dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Devaki Amma, Sadasivan, Sadanandan, Sunanda vs Mangat Devaki Amma, Premanandan, Sunil regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Devaki Amma, Sadasivan, Sadanandan, Sunanda vs Mangat Devaki Amma, Premanandan, Sunil regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 06/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won