Case Summary
Deepthimol.T.S is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Sajila.A and Sherinsha. The plaintiff claims trespassing and attempts to demolish her property boundary.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing the boundaries.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, permanently restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff coupled with documentation proved the plaintiff's ownership and established the apprehensions of trespass.
The evidence of the plaintiff coupled with documentation proved the plaintiff's ownership and established the apprehensions of trespass.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts. A1 and A2 would prove the case of the plaintiff. Pleadings and evidence of the plaintiff remains unchallenged...
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing the boundaries...
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Deepthimol.T.S
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajila.A.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sherinsha
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 2054/1996, Land Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A.Santhosh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.S.Ganesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing the boundaries and to cut open a new pathway.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing the boundaries and to cut open a new pathway through the plaint schedule property and from making any obstructions to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint schedule property by the plaintiff and also from committing any waste therein.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiff is the absolute owner in possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the plaintiff mutated the property in her name and remitting land tax.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Deepthimol.T.S vs Sajila.A et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Deepthimol.T.S vs Sajila.A et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction