Case Summary
City Heights filed a rent control petition against George Abraham Pachayil for non-compliance with a previous order regarding rent arrears. The court found that the respondent failed to show sufficient cause for non-compliance and the petition was closed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent ordered to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the respondent's plea for additional time to comply with a prior order and directed the respondent to vacate the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 10/2025 and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 10/2025 and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 10/2025 and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 10/2025 and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 10/2025 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- City Heights
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- George Abraham Pachayil
- Party Age
- 42
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition and other related documents.
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Praveen K. Joy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between City Heights vs George Abraham Pachayil regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between City Heights vs George Abraham Pachayil regarding Rent Control Petition