Case Summary
The plaintiff, Chattikkal Kari's son Veeran @ Veerabhadran, is seeking a partition of properties he co-owns with his son, Suresh, the defendant. The plaintiff claims that both have equal ownership of the properties, which the defendant denies.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaint schedule properties shall be divided into two equal shares by metes and bounds.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a preliminary decree for the partition of the properties into two equal shares. Each party is entitled to one share.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved that both parties own the properties equally.
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved that both parties own the properties equally.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved that both parties own the properties equally.
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved that both parties own the properties equally.
Supporting Evidence
Ext.A1 would show that both the plaintiff and the defendant have half share each in the petition schedule properties. Hence the claim of the plaintiff is proved from the available evidences.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, preliminary decree passed as follows: I. The plaint schedule properties shall divided into two equal shares by metes and bounds.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chattikkal Kari's son Veeran @ Veerabhadran
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chattikkal Veeran @ Veerabhadran's son Suresh
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of Doc. No.321/1971 of SRO Tanur
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.K.Beena
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sreekala Sudheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree passed to divide the plaint schedule properties into two equal shares.
Evidence:
In the result, preliminary decree passed as follows: I. The plaint schedule properties shall divided into two equal shares by metes and bounds.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get 1 share out of the 2 shares in the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
II. The plaintiff is entitled to get 1 share out of the 2 shares in the plaint schedule properties.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is entitled to get 1 share out of 2 shares in the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
III. The defendant is entitled to get 1 share out of 2 shares in the plaint schedule properties.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Separate allotment of share in the property to the parties shall be subject to payment of court fee for the same.
Evidence:
IV. Separate allotment of share in the property to the parties shall be subject to payment of court fee for the same.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A1 would show that both the plaintiff and the defendant have half share each in the petition schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chattikkal Kari's son Veeran @ Veerabhadran vs Chattikkal Veeran @ Veerabhadran's son Suresh regarding partition.
Case Code Year
Case between Chattikkal Kari's son Veeran @ Veerabhadran vs Chattikkal Veeran @ Veerabhadran's son Suresh regarding partition.