Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 351 OF 2017

Case between Chattikkal Kari's son Veeran @ Veerabhadran vs Chattikkal Veeran @ Veerabhadran's son Suresh regarding partition.

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-04-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Chattikkal Kari's son Veeran @ Veerabhadran, is seeking a partition of properties he co-owns with his son, Suresh, the defendant. The plaintiff claims that both have equal ownership of the properties, which the defendant denies.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a preliminary decree for the partition of the properties into two equal shares. Each party is entitled to one share.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaint schedule properties shall be divided into two equal shares by metes and bounds.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved that both parties own the properties equally.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, preliminary decree passed as follows: I. The plaint schedule properties shall divided into two equal shares by metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chattikkal Kari's son Veeran @ Veerabhadran (71 years) Thanalur amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Chattikkal Veeran @ Veerabhadran's son Suresh (49 years) Thanalur amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree passed to divide the plaint schedule properties into two equal shares.
Evidence:
In the result, preliminary decree passed as follows: I. The plaint schedule properties shall divided into two equal shares by metes and bounds.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get 1 share out of the 2 shares in the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
II. The plaintiff is entitled to get 1 share out of the 2 shares in the plaint schedule properties.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is entitled to get 1 share out of 2 shares in the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
III. The defendant is entitled to get 1 share out of 2 shares in the plaint schedule properties.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Separate allotment of share in the property to the parties shall be subject to payment of court fee for the same.
Evidence:
IV. Separate allotment of share in the property to the parties shall be subject to payment of court fee for the same.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A1 would show that both the plaintiff and the defendant have half share each in the petition schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases