Case Summary
The petitioners, led by Chandroth Vennalakath Ibrahim, sought relief under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act against the respondents. A compromise was reached, whereby the tenant surrendered possession of the premises to the petitioners.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the terms of the compromise wherein the respondent surrendered the premises to the petitioner. Consequently, the rent control petition was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise were found lawful and agreed upon by all parties voluntarily.
The terms of compromise were found lawful and agreed upon by all parties voluntarily.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of compromise were found lawful and agreed upon by all parties voluntarily.
The terms of compromise were found lawful and agreed upon by all parties voluntarily.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that all parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and signed by them.
Judgment Evidence:
As per the terms of compromise the respondent has surrendered the petition schedule building to the petitioner and the petitioner has acknowledged that he received the vacant possession of the tenanted premises along with key. Since the rent control petition is filed under Section 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act, and there remains nothing to be adjudicated, the rent control petition is to be disposed accordingly.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandroth Vennalakath Ibrahim
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.V. Abdulla
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kallaroth Shahida
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sharmina
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rashid
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Twinkle M.G. Road
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jash Shailesh Desai
- Party Age
- 33
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.C. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P. Rexy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.U. Ziyad
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.A. Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent has surrendered the petition schedule building to the petitioner, and the petitioner has acknowledged that he received the vacant possession of the tenanted premises along with the key.
Evidence:
As per the terms of compromise the respondent has surrendered the petition schedule building to the petitioner and the petitioner has acknowledged that he received the vacant possession of the tenanted premises along with key.
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as there remains nothing to be adjudicated.
Evidence:
Since the rent control petition is filed under Section 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act, and there remains nothing to be adjudicated, the rent control petition is to be disposed accordingly.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Chandroth Vennalakath Ibrahim et al vs M/s. Twinkle M.G. Road regarding compromise in rent control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Chandroth Vennalakath Ibrahim et al vs M/s. Twinkle M.G. Road regarding compromise in rent control petition.