Case Summary
Capt. John Robert has filed a petition against Mrs. Jancy Antony regarding non-compliance with a rent control order. The court has determined that the respondent failed to comply with the previous order to pay rent arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner is directed to be put in vacant possession of the building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has stopped the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 3/2025 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under Section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Capt. John Robert
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Jancy Antony
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Swapna.S.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rohini Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sindhu. S. Kamath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Suraj Kumar D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Karthika Sivan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A. Jayasankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manu Govind
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Capt. John Robert vs Mrs. Jancy Antony regarding rent control compliance
Case Code Year
Case between Capt. John Robert vs Mrs. Jancy Antony regarding rent control compliance