Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1160/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs R-Tech Glass Solutions et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-02-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Canara Bank is seeking to recover ₹9,93,667 from the defendants who failed to repay a loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff Canara Bank awarded ₹9,93,667 with 6% interest per annum from the date of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Kaloor JNL Stadium Branch, 39/2882 A(1), First Floor, DAVIDS Pavillion, Stadium Link Road, Kaloor P.O, Ernakulam -17

Defendants

R-Tech Glass Solutions (Age not specified years) 45/2146A Vadarath Road, Kuthapady, Thammanam P.O, Ernakulam 682 032 Mr. Ramesh Babu K.N (42 years) Aananthapurath House, Aananthapuram Lane, Behind Ananthapuram Temple, Ernakulam - 682 032

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money and Loan Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants directed to pay a specific sum to the plaintiff with interest
Evidence:
There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorisation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A7 and Ext.A8
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A10 and Ext.A13
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A14 and Ext.A18
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A15 and Ext.A19
Document Type: Application form for loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A22
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A23

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases