Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1160/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs R-Tech Glass Solutions et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-02-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Canara Bank is seeking to recover ₹9,93,667 from the defendants who failed to repay a loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff Canara Bank awarded ₹9,93,667 with 6% interest per annum from the date of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff Canara Bank awarded ₹9,93,667 with 6% interest per annum from the date of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Senior Manager, Divya Mathew
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R-Tech Glass Solutions
Relation
Proprietor Mr. Ramesh Babu K.N
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Ramesh Babu K.N
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o. B. Narayanakutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Authorisation Letter, Loan Application form, Sanction Memo, Cash Credit Agreement, Request for overdraft facilities, Pronote, Letter of renewal, Loan Application, Letter of Undertaking, Agreement Cum Deed of Hypothecation, Acknowledgment of debt and security, Application form for Loans, Sanction Letter
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kavya P. Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money and Loan Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants directed to pay a specific sum to the plaintiff with interest
Evidence:
There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorisation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A7 and Ext.A8
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A10 and Ext.A13
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A14 and Ext.A18
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A15 and Ext.A19
Document Type: Application form for loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A22
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevance not mentioned
Reference:
Ext.A23

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs R-Tech Glass Solutions et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs R-Tech Glass Solutions et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs Divyamol A K regarding Suit for realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda, Vazhakkala Branch vs Pushpa P regarding Suit for realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Kulsum Boutique and Beauty Parlour et al regarding Money Realisation
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won