Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 171/2024

Case between C. Hari Prakash et al vs Prasanna Sajeev regarding eviction under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-11-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C. Hari Prakash and D. Jayasree, landlords, petitioned for eviction of their tenant Prasanna Sajeev for failing to pay rent. The court found that the tenant had defaulted on rent payments despite being given notice.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction of the tenant due to non-payment of rent. The tenant was ordered to vacate the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The landlord established that the tenant willfully defaulted on rent payments and did not provide sufficient evidence to support the defense.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) of the Act with costs as follows: 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

C. Hari Prakash (57 years) Madathil House, Kandalloor south P.O., Kayamkulam, Alappuzha D. Jayasree (54 years) Madathil House, Kandalloor south P.O., Kayamkulam, Alappuzha

Defendants

Prasanna Sajeev (Age not specified years) Pulluttil house, Perumbalam P.O, Cherthala Alappuzha- 688570 Presently at Jit & Jit Lane 22, Janatha Road, Vyttila Kochi- 19

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to recover possession of the schedule building from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the tenancy, including the agreed rent and advance, which are central to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued to inform the respondent of the arrears and is necessary for the eviction proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt serves as proof of sending the lawyer's notice to the respondent, fulfilling a legal requirement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms the receipt of the lawyer's notice by the respondent, which is crucial for the case against her.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 04/03/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases