Case Summary
C. Gopalakrishnan filed a petition against Kiran B. Raj for non-compliance with a rent control order. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with rent payment requirements.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the respondent should vacate the premises due to non-compliance with prior orders regarding rent payment. The petitioner is to be put in possession of the building within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to show cause for non-compliance with the rent payment order.
The respondent failed to show cause for non-compliance with the rent payment order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to show cause for non-compliance with the rent payment order.
The respondent failed to show cause for non-compliance with the rent payment order.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C. Gopalakrishnan
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shri. Kiran B. Raj
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non-compliance of the said order by the respondent
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vipin D.G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Daniel A.J.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manisha V.V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anna Rose Nambadan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.B. Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.T. Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from the date of the order.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between C. Gopalakrishnan vs Shri. Kiran B. Raj regarding rent control compliance
Case Code Year
Case between C. Gopalakrishnan vs Shri. Kiran B. Raj regarding rent control compliance