Case Summary
The case involves Bineesh V as the plaintiff seeking partition and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Vamadevan, Aneesh, and Sineesh. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court's judgment resulted in the dismissal of the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent represented. Plaintiff not present. Suit dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bineesh V
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vamadevan
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aneesh
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sineesh
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.R.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent represented. Plaintiff not present. Suit dismissed.
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent represented. Plaintiff not present. Suit dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Bineesh V vs Vamadevan et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Bineesh V vs Vamadevan et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory Injunction