OS. No. 622/2021

Case between Bhamini vs Nandhini et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-10-31

Duration

approximately-4 years 6 months

Case Closed

Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bhamini, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nandhini and others regarding a civil matter. The court found the plaintiff absent and dismissed the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and did not provide any evidence.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not present any evidence.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The court found the plaintiff absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Bhamini
Party Age: 78
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nandhini
Party Age: 74
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Remani
Party Age: 72
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Reghumani
Party Age: 70
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sudhamani
Party Age: 68
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Suresh Babu
Party Age: 66
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Rini Agustine
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Binu Balachandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Resmy. S
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.

Evidence: