Case Summary
The petitioner, B. Sukumaran, sought eviction against the respondents for failure to comply with rent payment orders. The court found that the respondents had not complied with the previous orders regarding rent arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondents directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondents to vacate the premises due to non-compliance with rent payment orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent arrears payment.
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent arrears payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent arrears payment.
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent arrears payment.
Supporting Evidence
The respondents having failed to comply with the order in IA.1/2025 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondents to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- B. Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- RAHA Ayurveda Hospital
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.M.Aslam
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dr. A.M.Anwar
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.S. Manu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dilu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A.A. Anupaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sivaprasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Neethu K. Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vijay Kumar C.Y
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anandhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Line Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manju E.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dainy Davis
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rilna Radhakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sajeeb K. Yusuf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the respondents to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondents to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between B. Sukumaran vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between B. Sukumaran vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction