Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 288 OF 2015

Case between Ashraf et al vs Ayisha Beevi et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-01-05
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Thu, 01/05/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit for injunction was filed by plaintiffs against defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the demise of the 1st plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for injunction due to default by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not available
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for injunction due to default by the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Not available
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. 1st plaintiff is no more. No steps seen taken even after repeated chances were given. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashraf
Relation
S/o. Kunhava
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saramma
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o. Kunhava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayisha Beevi
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o. Hamza
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o. Hamza
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunhan Bava
Party Age
70
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kabeer
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o. Kunhan Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sakkariya
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o. Kunhan Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ameer
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o. Kunhan Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usman
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o. Kunhan Bava
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Vipin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A.M. Rafeek
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Mohammed Shihab
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ashraf et al vs Ayisha Beevi et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ashraf et al vs Ayisha Beevi et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 01/05/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/05/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 01/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won