Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 27/2024

Case between Asha Varkey alias Asha Paul Reji vs Gulfaar Business Private Limited regarding non-compliance with rent control order.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-10-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Asha Varkey filed a petition against Gulfaar Business Private Limited for not complying with a rent control order. The court found the respondent in default and ruled on the consequences for non-compliance.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the rent control order. As a consequence, the proceedings were stopped and the petitioner was awarded vacant possession of the building.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner to be put in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to show sufficient cause for non-compliance with the rent order.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Asha Varkey alias Asha Paul Reji (58 years years) C.C.XLI/2683, Tharakandathil House, Banerji Road, Thrikkanarattom Desom, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Pin-682018 George Varkey Tharakandathil (56 years years) Plot No.27, Green Hill, Opp Water Tank, Socorro, Porvorim, North Goa, Bardez, Goa, Pin-403501

Defendants

Gulfaar Business Private Limited (Age not specified years) Tharakandom Estate, A-Block, 1st Floor, Kurishupally Road, Ravipuram, Kochi-15 Anvar Sadath (47 years years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order stopping all further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases