Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 25/2024

Case between A.R. Rejeesh vs Ramesh Kumar regarding eviction for non-payment of rent

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A.R. Rejeesh, the petitioner, is seeking eviction of Ramesh Kumar for not paying rent for a leased building. The petitioner claims a bona fide need for the property as his family lacks suitable accommodation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction due to non-payment of rent and the petitioner's pressing need for the property. The respondent is ordered to vacate within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for eviction due to non-payment of rent and the petitioner's pressing need for the property. The respondent is ordered to vacate within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established his claim of unpaid rent and bona fide need for the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner established his claim of unpaid rent and bona fide need for the property.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A3 and Ext. C1 established his case as pleaded by him. It shows that the rent is in arrears. The bonafide need was projected by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.R. Rejeesh
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramesh Kumar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No. 8444/2005 of SRO, Ernakulam, Copy of Lawyer's notice, Original returned cover unclaimed along with acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Abrahim Abdul Samad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Subin K. Sudheer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is granted possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is entitled to recover costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed establishing ownership of the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice demanding payment of due rent and vacant possession.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original returned cover indicating the notice sent to the respondent was unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed in support of the petitioner's claim.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between A.R. Rejeesh vs Ramesh Kumar regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
Case Code Year
Case between A.R. Rejeesh vs Ramesh Kumar regarding eviction for non-payment of rent

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/17/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won