Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 196/2025

Case between Antony P.J. vs Bastin Sebastian regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2026-01-13
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Closed
Tue, 01/13/2026 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Antony P.J., is seeking recovery of Rs.50,000/- paid to the defendant, Bastin Sebastian, as an advance for a job that was never provided. The defendant failed to deliver the job documents after receiving the money, prompting the plaintiff to file this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs.50,000/- along with interest and costs from the defendant. The judgment establishes the entitlement of the plaintiff to the claimed amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.50,000/- with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till date of decree and at 6% per annum from date of decree till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs.50,000/- along with interest and costs from the defendant. The judgment establishes the entitlement of the plaintiff to the claimed amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved his claim with supporting evidence and testimonies.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved his claim with supporting evidence and testimonies.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and PW2 and Ext.X1 series, established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony P.J.
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bastin Sebastian
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Statement of account marked as Ext. X1 series.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.K. Rapheeque
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.B Nidhinkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vidya C.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lakshmi priya K S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Neethu Elizabeth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.50,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 12% per annum for Rs.50,000/- from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 6% per annum for Rs.50,000/- from the date of decree till the date of realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement of account was marked; however, it lacked certification and was rejected.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These reflect the transactions made from the plaintiff’s account to that of the defendant, supporting the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.X1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Antony P.J. vs Bastin Sebastian regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Antony P.J. vs Bastin Sebastian regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 04/14/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/13/2026 - 12:00
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nadamel Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Sheeba Thambi regarding recovery of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. et al vs Franson Silver Rock, Laly Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Naseema vs Sajana regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sahala Jalal vs Jinson M.D regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sophy K. M. et al regarding realisation of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won