Case Summary
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for injunction. The court rejected the plaint as the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to absence of the petitioner and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was absent and did not remit BCF.
Petitioner was absent and did not remit BCF.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent and no representation. BCF not remitted till date.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11(C) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anilkumar. S
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lekhakumari
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hareendran
- Party Age
- 52
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nidheesh
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hareesh
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B. L. Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B. Sunil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit for injunction was filed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11(C) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anilkumar. S vs Lekhakumari et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Anilkumar. S vs Lekhakumari et al regarding injunction