Case Summary
The petitioners Anilkumar Palathinkal and Mrs. Cicily George filed for eviction against the respondents M.R.Prasad Kumar and Beena Prasad Kumar under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The court found that the respondents did not comply with previous orders regarding rent arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondents directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents failed to comply with court orders regarding rent arrears.
The respondents failed to comply with court orders regarding rent arrears.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Anilkumar Palathinkal (52 years)
Palathinkal House, Near Petta Bridge, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin-682 301
Mrs. Cicily George (77 years)
Palathinkal House, Near Petta Bridge, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin-682 301
Defendants
M.R.Prasad Kumar (40 years)
Elumana Road, Eroor South P.O., Tripunithura, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. C/o M/s Vibrant Technologies, 32/2664, Thammanam, Kochi-32
Beena Prasad Kumar (Age not specified years)
M/s Vibrant Technologies 32/2664, Thammanam, Kochi-32
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.