Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 48/2025

Case between Aneesa T.A. vs Ashroph P.P. regarding landlord-tenant relationship eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-09-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Aneesa T.A., is seeking eviction of the respondent, Ashroph P.P., under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The respondent denies the landlord-tenant relationship, claiming fraudulent execution of sale deeds and the absence of a valid rent agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found the denial of the landlord-tenant relationship by the respondent to be bonafide. Consequently, the rent control petition was dismissed, and the parties were directed to approach the civil jurisdiction for resolution.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The denial of the landlord-tenant relationship was considered bonafide.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, it is found that the denial of title of the petitioner in the RCP by the respondents is found bonafide and hence the parties to the rent control petition are relegated to the competent court of civil jurisdiction for deciding the matters referred to above.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Aneesa T.A. (31 years years) Pottekattil House, Door No.7/2, Cheranalloor, Chittoor Desom, South Chittoor, PIN-682027

Defendants

Ashroph P.P. alias Ashraf P.P. (65 years years) Poyyattil House, Kulayettikkara, Amballoor, Arayankavu Desom, Kulayettikkara P.O., Ernakulam District, PIN-682 315

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner sought eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Thus in the light of above facts and circumstances of this case, there exists denial of title of the petitioner in the rent control petition and such denial made by the respondents is a bonafide one.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The petitioner impliedly sought for a mandatory injunction directing the respondent to vacate the premises.
Evidence:
The petitioner has filed IA No. 2/2025 under Section 12 of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The petitioner purchased A schedule room by this Sale Deed.
Reference:
Sale Deed No.2443 of 2022
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The respondent executed this Sale Deed in favor of the petitioner for B schedule shop room.
Reference:
Sale No. 2397/2023 of SRO Maradu
Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
A rent deed was executed on 22.11.2023 to continue the tenancy for a further period.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Oral evidence presented in support of claims and defenses.
Reference:
null

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases