Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 22/2024

Case between The Amballoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. No. 502 et al vs Rugmini regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-30
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Amballoor Service Co-operative Bank and its President filed a petition against Rugmini for eviction from their property. The petitioners claimed a bona fide need for the property, which the respondent contested without filing any objections.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to vacate the property within 30 days. The petitioners were also entitled to recover costs from the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established their bona fide need for the property without any counter evidence from the respondent.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed u/S 11(3) of the Act as follows: 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

The Amballoor Service Co­operative Bank Ltd. No. 502 (Age not specified years) Kanjiramattam Branch, Amballoor, Amballoor Village, Ernakulam V.F. Varghese (52 years) Parakkaveliyil, Amballur, Ernakulam­682 315 The Board of Directors of the Amballoor Service Co­operative Bank Ltd. No. 502 (Age not specified years) Kanjiramattam Branch, Amballoor, Amballoor Village, Ernakulam­682 315 N.P. Rajeev (65 years) Sumangaly, Kanjiramattam, Amballur Village, Ernakulam­682315

Defendants

Rugmini (69 years) Chambbannakunnel House, Amballoor.P.O., Kanjiramattam, Ernakulam­682 315.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to vacate the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/S 11(3) of the Act as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the rental agreement between the petitioners and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued to inform the respondent about the eviction and the need for the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card serves as proof of delivery of the lawyer's notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This refers to the testimony provided by the petitioner's Secretary, V.F. Varghese, in support of the petition.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 10/24/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Co-operative Society

Similar Cases