Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 65/2022

Case between S. Ramachandra Panicker vs Ansar regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S. Ramachandra Panicker filed a petition for eviction against Ansar under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. A compromise was reached between the parties, and the court accepted the terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the rent control petition based on the terms of compromise, with one clause excluded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise were found lawful and accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition is allowed, in terms of compromise, except clause No. 9 in the above compromise.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

S. Ramachandra Panicker (80 years) Thidunnayil House, Thidunnayil Lane, Vytilla, Ernakulam, Kochi,Pin code – 682 019

Defendants

Ansar (40 years) Cheruppalli House, Edayapuram, Aluva P.O., Pin code – 683 101

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Rent control petition is allowed, in terms of compromise, except clause No. 9 in the above compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise IA
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the lawful terms of the compromise and recorded the terms and conditions.
Reference:
IA 02/2023

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases