Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 91/2018

Case between Salam et al vs O.M. Nazar regarding eviction of tenant

Court
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-10-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Salam and others, seek eviction of the respondent, O.M. Nazar, from a shop room they claim is required for their own use. The respondent argues that the petition lacks legal standing due to alleged non-joinder of necessary parties and disputes the petitioners' claimed ownership.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, ordering the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days, citing the petitioners' genuine need for the shop for their business.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, ordering the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days, citing the petitioners' genuine need for the shop for their business.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners proved a bona fide need for the shop for their own occupation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners proved a bona fide need for the shop for their own occupation.
Supporting Evidence
The court is convinced with the bona fide need as projected by the petitioner under section 11(3) of the Act. Nothing was brought out in evidence to discredit the same.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under sections 11(3) and 11(4)(iii) of the Act as follows; The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Salam
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saly
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sakeer
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sameer
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. O.M. Nazar
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer’s notice dated 24.04.2018, Postal receipts.
Defendants Documents
Rent renewal letter to respondent dated 20.03.2018.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Jacob Pulickekudy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sumeesh K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nivya Valson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Sulfath N.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dinic J. Coyeara
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.G. Cleetus
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to vacate the premises.
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners are entitled to costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
Hence, the petitioner is entitled to get the costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer’s notice issued to the respondent seeking vacant possession.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer’s notice issued to the respondent seeking vacant possession.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer’s notice issued to another respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt related to the sending of notices.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt dated related to the notices.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card issued by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply notice issued by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply notice issued by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building certificate issued by Kalamassery Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building certificate issued by Kalamassery Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building certificate issued by Kalamassery Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building certificate issued by Kalamassery Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building certificate issued by Kalamassery Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building certificate issued by Kalamassery Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Building certificates
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building certificate series issued by Kalamassery Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photograph associated with the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A22
Document Type: Rent renewal letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rent renewal letter to respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Rent renewal letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rent renewal letter to respondent, subject to objection.
Reference:
Ext.B1(a)
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Order in an associated case.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report in associated cases.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between Salam et al vs O.M. Nazar regarding eviction of tenant
Case Code Year
Case between Salam et al vs O.M. Nazar regarding eviction of tenant

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Kuppayandi Pillai vs Aravindakshan Nair regarding eviction from a collapsed building
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between S. Ramachandra Panicker vs Ansar regarding eviction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won