Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 190/2021

Case between Manoj Thekiniath vs Sabitha Nazir regarding petition for eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Manoj Thekiniath, filed an eviction petition against the respondent, Sabitha Nazir, under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that the respondent did not comply with prior court orders, leading to the closure of the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application of the respondent due to non-compliance with previous orders and ordered the respondent to vacate the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The court directed the respondent to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with the orders of the court.

Judgment Evidence:

Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Manoj Thekiniath (50 years) Thekiniath House, Perinchery P.O., Thrissur 680 306

Defendants

Sabitha Nazir (34 years) 1373, M.S. Manzil, Vennala, Kochi-682032

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Respondent/ tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases