Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 238 OF 2015

Case between Amalath Velayudhan et al vs Valiyapeediyekkal Suhail regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-08-05
Duration
2 years
Case Closed
Sat, 08/05/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit for injunction was filed by multiple plaintiffs against the defendant. However, the case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Plaintiff called, absent. Hence dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this, the 5th day of August, 2017) MUNSIFF.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Amalath Velayudhan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Amalath Mohanan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Amalath Appu
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Preman
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Haridasn
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Amalath Kuttikrishna Kumar
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valiyapeediyekkal Suhail
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E.C. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Praveen
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.V. Ninthosh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Plaintiff called, absent. Hence dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Amalath Velayudhan et al vs Valiyapeediyekkal Suhail regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Amalath Velayudhan et al vs Valiyapeediyekkal Suhail regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 08/05/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/05/2017 - 12:00
From
Tue, 08/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won