Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 383 OF 2016

Case between Alungal deceased Kunhahammed Haji's children et al vs Alungal deceased Kunhahammed Haji's son Aboobacker et al regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-01-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are the children and wives of the deceased Kunhahammed Haji, while the defendants are the son and wife of the deceased. The case involves a suit for injunction which was ultimately dismissed due to absence of plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the plaintiffs failed to appear in court. Both defendants were also not represented during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the plaintiffs failed to appear in court. Both defendants were also not represented during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs' absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs' absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's counsel submitted no instruction. Defendant absent not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saidalikkutty
Party Age
55
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed kutty
Party Age
53
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shahul Hameed
Party Age
34
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Shafi
Party Age
30
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beekkutty Umma
Party Age
58
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mariyamu Umma
Party Age
56
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
46
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sujeera
Party Age
32
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kathiyamakutty
Party Age
76
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kadiyamu Umma
Party Age
71
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aboobacker
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseema
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Padmakumar.K.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C.Shanmughan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for Injunction.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Alungal deceased Kunhahammed Haji's children et al vs Alungal deceased Kunhahammed Haji's son Aboobacker et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Alungal deceased Kunhahammed Haji's children et al vs Alungal deceased Kunhahammed Haji's son Aboobacker et al regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 01/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won