Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 39 OF 2016

Case between Ali vs Sharafudheen regarding return of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-30
Duration
3 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ali, the plaintiff, entered into a partnership agreement with Sharafudheen, the defendant, for a hotel business. After not receiving any profit, Ali sought the return of his investment, which had not been paid by Sharafudheen.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,39,785/- with interest. The suit was found not barred by limitation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 1,39,785/- with interest
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the defendant admitted to receiving the share amount and failed to provide evidence of losses that would justify non-payment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with cost as follows: Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 1,39,785/- with interest at the rate of 6 % per annum from the date of suit, till the realization, from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ali (40 years years) Chalakkaparambil House, Thevalappuram desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk Muhammed (70 years years) Chalakkaparambil House, Thalakkad amsom, Thevalappuram desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Sharafudheen (45 years years) Palakkalakath House, Thalakkad amsom, Thevalappuram desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 1,39,785/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount as claimed in the plaint from the defendant.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement dated 6-9-2002 between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the return of the share amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Plaintiff in PLP
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The photocopy of the plaint in PLP No. 255/2015 which contains a demand for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
One of the identities provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another identity provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another identity provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
Case Filed
Sat, 01/30/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases