Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 39 OF 2016

Case between Ali vs Sharafudheen regarding return of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-30
Duration
3 years 5 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ali, the plaintiff, entered into a partnership agreement with Sharafudheen, the defendant, for a hotel business. After not receiving any profit, Ali sought the return of his investment, which had not been paid by Sharafudheen.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,39,785/- with interest. The suit was found not barred by limitation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 1,39,785/- with interest
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,39,785/- with interest. The suit was found not barred by limitation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the defendant admitted to receiving the share amount and failed to provide evidence of losses that would justify non-payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the defendant admitted to receiving the share amount and failed to provide evidence of losses that would justify non-payment.
Supporting Evidence
The defendant admitted that the amount paid by the plaintiff was utilized for his personal requirements and failed to demonstrate any legitimate reason for withholding payment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with cost as follows: Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 1,39,785/- with interest at the rate of 6 % per annum from the date of suit, till the realization, from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ali
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sharafudheen
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement dated 6-9-2002, Photo copy of Plaint in PLP No. 255/2015, Passport No. N 783617, Passport No. E 3345979, True copy of -Passport No. L 0015436.
Defendants Documents
NIL

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.P.Hussain.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 1,39,785/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount as claimed in the plaint from the defendant.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement dated 6-9-2002 between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the return of the share amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Plaintiff in PLP
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The photocopy of the plaint in PLP No. 255/2015 which contains a demand for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
One of the identities provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another identity provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another identity provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ali vs Sharafudheen regarding return of money
Case Code Year
Case between Ali vs Sharafudheen regarding return of money

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 01/30/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Nahas.C.P. regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rasiya, Mumtaz vs Rukhiya, Sabariya, Ramli, Sameera (Meera), Dajani regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Basheer et al vs Nafeesa et al regarding fixation of boundary.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abdulla vs Sainaba et al regarding undisclosed matter
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Original Suit Unknown