Case Summary
The plaintiff, Adhithya L. A, filed a suit for partition. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The court concluded that the suit would not proceed in the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Adhithya L. A
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shalini I
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vismay
- Party Age
- 15
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Niveditha
- Party Age
- 13
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ramees Beevi A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thajudeen Ahammed
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Adhithya L. A vs Shalini I et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Adhithya L. A vs Shalini I et al regarding partition