Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 214 OF 20 16

Case between Abdullakutty vs Koya et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-30
Duration
about 1 year
Case Closed
Mon, 10/30/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdullakutty, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against multiple defendants for unspecified reasons. The court dismissed the suit due to default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for injunction due to the plaintiff's failure to produce paper publication as required by a petition for sanction under Order 1 Rule 8.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for injunction due to the plaintiff's failure to produce paper publication as required by a petition for sanction under Order 1 Rule 8.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Paper publication not produced in IA. 1349/2016 since it is a petition for sanction under Order 1 Rule 8. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdullakutty
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o. Saidalikutty @ Cheriya Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Koya
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o. Nafeesa Mol
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yoosaf
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o. Hamzakutyy
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mamukoya
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o. Aminakutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haneefa
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o. Abdul Kadar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Azees
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o. Beerankutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Paper publication as required in IA. 1349/2016
Defendants Documents
Not provided

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Relief sought through the suit for injunction
Evidence:
Paper publication not produced in IA. 1349/2016 since it is a petition for sanction under Order 1 Rule 8. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdullakutty vs Koya et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdullakutty vs Koya et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 10/30/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/30/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 10/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won