Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 486/2021

Case between Abdul Shakoor K.A vs Venugopalan K.V regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M .
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-4 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Abdul Shakoor K.A, is seeking reimbursement from the defendant, Venugopalan K.V, for financial contributions made towards a failed business investment. The plaintiff claims to have invested significant amounts at the defendant's request, but has been excluded from the business operations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant is liable to repay a total of ₹9,28,596/- with applicable interest. The court acknowledged the breach of trust by the defendant in managing the funds.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay ₹9,28,596/- to the plaintiff with interest at 7.5% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant's breach of agreement and financial mismanagement led to the plaintiff's entitlement to reimbursement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows, The defendant shall pay the plaintiff a sum of ₹9,28,596/- to the plaintiff with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the suit till date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Shakoor K.A (58 years years) 4/897, Ashianan, Anjikath Lane, Vallathol Junction, Thrikkakkara P.O, - 682 021

Defendants

Venugopalan K.V (57 years years) Kallumadathil house,No.1, Anugraha apartments, Pallissery road, Palarivattom P.O, - 682 025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹9,28,596/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Thus, the plaintiff is found entitled to realize Rs. 9,11,000/- from the defendant...
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the cause of action till the date of decree.
Evidence:
the total amount allowed as principal sum adjudged is Rs. 9,28,596/-.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled for the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Thus, the issue as to costs are also found in favour of the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Extract of the transaction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the transaction of ₹1,00,000/- using G-Pay for booking the franchise.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Extract of the transaction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the transaction for the same purpose.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Extract of the transaction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing another transaction towards the franchise.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Extract of the transaction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing another transaction towards the franchise.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Electronic fund transfer application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the transfer of ₹7,45,000/- to M/s Fabrico Cleaning Solutions for machinery purchase.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: WhatsApp communication screenshot
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing communication where the defendant requested the plaintiff to make the transfer.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document providing proof of the plaintiff's bank account transactions relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Customer application form
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document related to the defendant's mobile number connection.
Reference:
Ext.X2
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document showing the financial situation of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Wed, 01/20/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases