Case Summary
Abdul Rasheed is the plaintiff, while Shajahan is the defendant. The case revolves around a dispute concerning a mutual agreement for the exchange of properties, where the plaintiff claims the defendant failed to fulfill his contractual obligations.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by Abdul Rasheed against Shajahan, finding that the evidence presented by the plaintiff did not sufficiently establish his claims regarding the mutual agreement.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's case lacked credibility and sufficient evidence.
The plaintiff's case lacked credibility and sufficient evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's case lacked credibility and sufficient evidence.
The plaintiff's case lacked credibility and sufficient evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff in this regard is not probable to believe. As discussed above, the plaintiff's case is not believable and convincing.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Rasheed
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajahan
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Agreement dated 30-01-2012, Copy of Lawyer notice dated 06-02-2014, Copy of Agreement dated 22-09-2011.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Deepa Gopi Nath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Mehroof Shihab
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover Rs. 4,02,600/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is not entitled to get any relief, as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement executed between the plaintiff and the defendant on 30.01.2012 was central to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
A notice demanding the re-transfer of property or compensation from the defendant was issued.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another agreement related to the case introduced by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Rasheed vs Shajahan regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Rasheed vs Shajahan regarding realization of money