RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.12 OF 2018

Case between Abdul Nazer vs Ameer Babu regarding eviction of tenant.

Court

COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt.NIMMI.K.K.

Order Date

2019-03-28

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Nazer filed a petition against Ameer Babu for eviction from a rented building due to non-payment of rent and alleged negligence in maintaining the property. The petitioner claims he needs the property for his own business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The petition for eviction was partially granted, allowing the petitioner to reclaim the premises due to bona fide need. However, other claims were dismissed.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within 2 months.

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated a bona fide need for the property and was unchallenged due to the respondent's absence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed u/s 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 as follows: a) The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within 2 months from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Nazer (39 years years) Cheriyath Quarters, Kattachira Road, Near Viswas Theatre, Thalakkad amsom desom, PO. B.P.Angadi

Defendants

Ameer Babu (40 years years) Eranhikkal House, Thalakkad amsom desom, PO. B.P.Angadi

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.

Evidence:

The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within 2 months from today.

Relief Type: Costs

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The petitioner is entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Evidence:

The petitioner is entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner's Report

Submitted By: Court

Relevance:

This report was submitted by the Advocate Commissioner and used to analyze the condition of the petition schedule building.

Reference:

Ext.C1

Document Type: Commission Plan