Case Summary
Abdu filed a suit against Saithu Haji and Usman seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Abdu for injunction was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdu
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o. Saithu Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saithu Haji
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o. Mammukkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Usman
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o. Saithu Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.M. Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Abdu sought injunction relief
Evidence:
Plaintiff called absent. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdu vs Saithu Haji et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdu vs Saithu Haji et al regarding injunction