Case Summary
Case involves Abdu suing Shajimon et al for injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Suit is decreed in terms compromise.
Key Reasoning:
Not available
Not available
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdu
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajimon
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Musthafa
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Majeed
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Laila
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subaida
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Harigovind P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shaheeda C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit for injunction
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. IA.2406/2019 allowed. Defendants 2 to 6 deleted from party array. IA.2407/2019 allowed. Terms are lawful. Compromise recorded. Suit is decreed in terms compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdu et al vs Shajimon et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdu et al vs Shajimon et al regarding injunction