Case Summary
Aayishu filed a restoration petition against multiple respondents which was allowed by the Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition filed by Aayishu was allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Heard. Allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aayishu
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ambalapprambil Yahu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thitheerumma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aachutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kadeeja
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shafi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramla
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammadali
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aamina
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aayisha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Iyyathumma
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- M.Abdul Kader
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Description:
Restoration of the petition
Evidence:
Heard. Allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aayishu vs Ambalapprambil Yahu et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Aayishu vs Ambalapprambil Yahu et al regarding restoration petition