| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3841 - 3845 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between M/s. Karuvellil Traders vs Sujith N S regarding default dismissal

Civil Suit

O.S. No.143/2023

Perumbavoor

2025-07-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thankamma et al vs Sukumaran T P et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.336/2018

2025-07-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vazhakkulam Block Rural Co-operative Society No.E1082 vs Sunitha M A et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

E.P.263/2023

2025-07-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chandran et al vs Sarala Vasu et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Civil Suit

OS No.158/2025

Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District

2025-07-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pallikkara Devaswam et al vs Radhamma @ Radha et al regarding amendment of plaint

Civil Suit

OS No.148/2017

2025-07-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Sufficient Evidence

Plaintiffs often lacked adequate evidence to support their claims or prove the means of the respondents.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Many petitions were dismissed for default due to non-payment of batta or required fees.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

The absence of the petitioner in court led to the dismissal of several cases.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Lack of Steps Taken

Numerous cases were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Sufficient Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Petitioner

Lack of Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?