| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3826 - 3830 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between E.No. 307, Kunnathunad Taluk, Housing Co-operative Society represented by Secretary Clency Anto, W/o.Joy vs Varghese et al regarding execution of decree for realization of debt.

Execution Petition

E.P.No.195/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-07-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajappan et al vs Lissy Mathew et al regarding a civil suit.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.234/2018

Perumbavoor

2025-07-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jacob Mathew et al vs Share wealth Chitts Ltd regarding execution of decree

Execution Application

O.S.No.6628/2016

Perumbavoor

2025-07-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jacob Mathew et al vs Share wealth Chitts Ltd regarding execution of decree

Civil Suit

O.S.No. 6628/2016

Perumbavoor

2025-07-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jacob Mathew et al vs Sharewelath Chitts Ltd regarding execution of a money decree.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.4145/2017

2025-07-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide evidence supporting their claims, leading to dismissal.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not paying necessary fees or costs required by the court.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Plaintiffs were often absent in court leading to the dismissal of their cases.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?