| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1316 - 1320 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Aneesha Rasheed regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1015/2020

Ernakulam

2024-06-26

approximately-4 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. PDL Print vs M/s. Click Outdoor Media et al regarding counter claim dismissal.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 501/2021

Ernakulam

2024-09-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between T.Selvaran et al vs M.K.Ayyappan et al regarding plaint rejection

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1299/2016

ERNAKULAM

2024-06-27

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kalyani Mohan vs Dr. N. Kochupillai et al regarding Final Decree application

Civil Suit

O.S No. 574/2019

Ernakulam

2024-06-27

approximately-4 years 26 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anil E.V et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1069/2020

Ernakulam

2024-06-27

approximately-3 years 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Present Evidence

Plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to support claims regarding the means of the respondents.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to pay necessary court fees or batta for processing.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

The plaintiff's absence in court led to automatic dismissal of the petitions for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Lack of Steps Taken

Plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or responding to court mandates.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Present Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?