Case Summary
The plaintiffs are seeking a final decree for partition of property against the defendants. The case involves the division of the plaint schedule property among the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property as per the allotted shares
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the partition plan submitted by the Advocate Commissioner and divided the property among the parties as per the shares outlined in the preliminary decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs were entitled to a share of the property based on the preliminary decree.
The plaintiffs were entitled to a share of the property based on the preliminary decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs were entitled to a share of the property based on the preliminary decree.
The plaintiffs were entitled to a share of the property based on the preliminary decree.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint schedule property is found partible among plaintiff and defendants and the plaint schedule property is divided into 7 equal shares.
Judgment Evidence:
Final Decree is passed in accordance with Exhibit C1 series as follows; The 1st respondent/1st defendant is allotted 1/7th share... The 2nd respondent/2nd defendant is allotted 3/7th share... The petitioner/plaintiff is allotted 3/7th share...
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M N Thankachan
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasi
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moni
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V R Raveendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rahul Raveendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sunny James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition of property among the parties.
Evidence:
Final Decree is passed in accordance with Exhibit C1 series.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Used to effect the partition as per the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Survey Map
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Formed part of the final decree showing details of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Included in the final decree process.
Reference:
Ext.C1(b)
Case Classification
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M N Thankachan vs Sasi et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between M N Thankachan vs Sasi et al regarding partition of property