Case Summary
Ramachandran Nair is the plaintiff seeking to recover a deposit from Kelamangalam Jewallers and Sajith Kelamangalam, who did not respond to the lawsuit. The case involves an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- deposited for lending business.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay Rs.3,96,600/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to recover Rs.3,96,600/- from the defendants, including interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Evidence established the plaintiff's claim without rebuttal from the defendants.
Evidence established the plaintiff's claim without rebuttal from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Evidence established the plaintiff's claim without rebuttal from the defendants.
Evidence established the plaintiff's claim without rebuttal from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 3,96,600/- (Rupees three lakh ninety six thousand and six hundred only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of 3,50,000/- (Rupees three lakh and fifty thousand only) from the date of decree till its realization.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramachandran Nair
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kelamangalam Jewallers
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajith Kelamangalam
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Deposit receipt No.82/14-15 for Rs. 3,50,000, Copy of Passbook issued by defendants.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil. D. Kartha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ananthasankar.A. Kartha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 3,96,600 with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 3,96,600/- (Rupees three lakh ninety six thousand and six hundred only) ...
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Deposit receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the amount deposited by the plaintiff with the second defendant.
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Passbook
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the claim of transactions between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Ramachandran Nair vs Kelamangalam Jewallers et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Ramachandran Nair vs Kelamangalam Jewallers et al regarding realisation of money