Case Summary
The plaintiffs are a partnership firm involved in the sale of construction materials, and the defendant is a proprietor of a construction business. The plaintiffs filed the suit to recover an amount due for materials supplied on credit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant to pay ₹80,116 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendant is ordered to pay the sum of ₹80,116 with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their case with sufficient evidence and there was no evidence presented by the defendant to rebut it.
The plaintiffs established their case with sufficient evidence and there was no evidence presented by the defendant to rebut it.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their case with sufficient evidence and there was no evidence presented by the defendant to rebut it.
The plaintiffs established their case with sufficient evidence and there was no evidence presented by the defendant to rebut it.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹80,116 with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pukadiyil Traders
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Robin Raju
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o P.T. Raju
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Albin George
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o Robin Raju
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bimlesh Kumar Sigh
- Party Age
- 43
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoices and a ledger statement related to the defendant.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Karjet
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendant to pay a sum of ₹80,116 to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹80,116.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Costs to be realized from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice as proof of transaction between plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice as proof of transaction between plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice as proof of transaction between plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice as proof of transaction between plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Ledger statement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ledger statement report showing the amount due from defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Pukadiyil Traders et al vs Bimlesh Kumar Sigh regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Pukadiyil Traders et al vs Bimlesh Kumar Sigh regarding recovery of money.