| Niyamam AI

Displaying 666 - 670 of 21845

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Sharika Chandran et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.227/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nandini et al vs Saalli regarding partition and injunction.

Civil Suit

OS 182/2021

2025-08-23

approximately-4 years 3 days

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Vinayakumar K vs K.V.Salimon regarding realisation of money based on a cheque.

Civil Suit

OS 267/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-27

approximately-11 months 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Ragini M et al regarding realisation of money.

Original Suit

O.S No.137/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Binnu Thomas vs Sheebamol N.D regarding return of money.

Civil Suit

OS 37/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-27

approximately-1 year 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9623

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often could not provide evidence supporting their claims or proving defendants' financial capacities.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners were often absent from hearings, resulting in automatic dismissal of their cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking steps to issue necessary notices to the respondents.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?