| Niyamam AI

Displaying 661 - 665 of 21836

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Anju.S et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.167/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vinayakumar K vs K.V.Salimon regarding realisation of money based on a cheque.

Civil Suit

OS 267/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-27

approximately-11 months 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Ragini M et al regarding realisation of money.

Original Suit

O.S No.137/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Seema et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.165/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Sharika Chandran et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.227/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9620

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Insufficient evidence to demonstrate the means of defendants or other crucial aspects resulted in case dismissal.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Failure to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or appearing in court, led to dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation

The absence of representation for the plaintiff in court proceedings contributed to dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?