Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 37/2024

Case between Binnu Thomas vs Sheebamol N.D regarding return of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 months
Case Code No.
37
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Binnu Thomas filed a suit against Sheebamol N.D for the return of an advance loan related to a mortgage agreement. The defendant failed to provide the house as agreed and refused to return the advance amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the claimed amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹.1,55,250/- and 9% interest from the date of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the claimed amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff presented reliable evidence supporting his claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff presented reliable evidence supporting his claim.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence adduced by plaintiff, I hold that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹.1,55,250/-(Rupees One Lakh Fifty Five Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty only) and also to realize 9% interest from the defendant and his assets from the date of the suit ie, 19.02.2024 till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Binnu Thomas
Party Age
27
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheebamol N.D
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Hypothication Agreement, Original receipt of Complaint, Acknowledgment of debt by the defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Manaph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹.1,55,250/- along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹.1,55,250/-(Rupees One Lakh Fifty Five Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty only) and also to realize 9% interest from the defendant and his assets from the date of the suit ie, 19.02.2024 till realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To establish the mortgage agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Receipt of Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the complaint filed by the plaintiff at the Vaikom Police Station.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment by the defendant of the debt owed to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Fri, 10/06/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Geetha et al vs Prabhakaran regarding lawful agreement.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lillykutty Tomy vs K.G. Venugopal regarding suit dismissal.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.N. Manoharan et al vs Deena Panicker et al regarding suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shaji et al vs Renjith Monai et al regarding a compromise petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaraj vs Sajimon regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won