Private Individual

The plaintiff is the Self Employers Service Society represented by Ms M V Josekutty. The defendants include Venugopalan Nair, Shaji Nair K V, and others. The case concerns a suit that was ultimately rejected by the court.

The plaintiffs are siblings seeking partition and separate possession of a property inherited from their deceased parents. The defendants are the wife and children of the plaintiffs' deceased brother, contesting the plaintiffs' claim.

This case involves the Self Employers Service Society and multiple defendants. The matter was settled at mediation and the terms were accepted by both parties.

The plaintiff is Self Employers Service Society represented by Mr. M V Josekutty. The defendants include James Joseph and two others, and the case involved a suit that was ultimately rejected by the court.

The decree holder EMART, represented by Santhosh Chacko, sought execution of a decree against the judgment debtor Venu M Nair. The court recorded full and final satisfaction of the decree and closed the execution petition.

M/s Marby Pharmaceuticals is the decree holder and Jerusalem Marthoma Church is the judgment debtor. The execution petition was considered and the court found that the entire amount has been paid, leading to the closure of the case.

Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited filed a suit against Sosamma Jacob and others. The case was dismissed for default as neither party was represented in court.

The plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society, was represented by Mr. M.V. Josekutty. The defendants included Saji P.S and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case.

Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank no. 3839, represented by Secretary P Sheeba, is the plaintiff. The defendants are Molamma Jayakumar, Mariyam M A, and Jayakumar K V. This case concerns an Execution Petition.

Sainu B, the 4th defendant, filed a petition arguing that O.S.294/2018 should be stayed due to overlapping issues with another pending suit, O.S.44/2018, regarding the dissolution of a partnership firm. The Municipality is involved as a counter petitioner.