OS No.459/2022

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Saji P.S et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court

Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam

Judge

Smt. Jyothi Babu R.

Order Date

2025-07-08

Duration

approximately-3 years 0 days

Case Closed

Tue, 07/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society, was represented by Mr. M.V. Josekutty. The defendants included Saji P.S and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and showed no interest in pursuing the matter.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

There was no representation for the plaintiff in the last posting also. Hence it has to be presumed that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Self Employers Service Society

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Saji P.S
Party Age: 51
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: S. Somaraj
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sini P.S
Party Age: 47
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sumathy P.K.
Party Age: 81
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K S Asif
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit is hence dismissed due to plaintiff not interested in prosecuting the case.

Evidence:

Hence it has to be presumed that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the case. Suit is hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification