Private Individual

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, Soumya S and Somasekharan, for recovery of an educational loan amounting to Rs. 7,04,513 due to default in repayment. The loan was sanctioned for the first defendant's education, with the second defendant as the co-obligant.

Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd filed a complaint against Rejani R for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled and the complaint was withdrawn.

The plaintiff, Mary Elizabeth Thomas, is seeking repayment of a staff security deposit and salary arrears from the defendants, who did not appear in court. The court found in favor of the plaintiff due to lack of rebuttal evidence from the defendants.

The complainant, a private limited company, accused the defendant of not repaying chit dues. The court found the accused not guilty due to insufficient evidence of a legally enforceable debt.

The complainant, M/s. Ceyenar Chemiclas Pvt.Ltd, filed a complaint against M/s Mariya Plast and its partners for an alleged offence under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, and the complaint was withdrawn.

The Plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society represented by M.V Josekutty, filed an execution petition against the Defendants Binoy Thomas, Benny Thomas, Jose George, and Jincemon Kurien for default. The court dismissed the execution petition due to lack of action by the plaintiff's counsel.

Nattakom Service Cooperative Bank No.3839 represented by Secretary Sheeba filed an execution petition against Molamma Abraham regarding certain proceedings. The court noted that no steps were taken, leading to the closure of the execution petition.

E-Mart is the decree holder represented by Santhosh Chacko, while Rani Mary Mathew is the judgment debtor. The Execution Petition has been dismissed for default as no steps were taken by the decree holder's counsel.

The case involves Remya Sabu claiming title over property originally belonging to her deceased father. The defendants include Vineesh Vijayan and various government officials responding to the plaintiff's application for property mutation.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of a loan amount that was not repaid. The defendants, despite several demands, failed to pay off the outstanding loan amount.