Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 791/2022

Case between Remya Sabu vs Vineesh Vijayan et al regarding declaration of title and Mandatory Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-11-17
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months
Case Closed
Mon, 11/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Remya Sabu claiming title over property originally belonging to her deceased father. The defendants include Vineesh Vijayan and various government officials responding to the plaintiff's application for property mutation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, confirming her title over the property and ordering the defendants to effect property mutation in her name.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant no. 2 to 4 are directed to effect mutation of the plaint schedule property in the name of the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, confirming her title over the property and ordering the defendants to effect property mutation in her name.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was the sole legal representative of her father, with the defendants having no legal claim over the property as per applicable laws.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff was the sole legal representative of her father, with the defendants having no legal claim over the property as per applicable laws.
Supporting Evidence
In the light of the above discussion, it can be held that the plaintiff is entitled to relief claimed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is decreed as follows: 1. It is declared that the plaintiff has got title and right over the plaint schedule property. 2. The defendant no.2 to 4 are directed to effect mutation of the plaint schedule property in the name of the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Remya Sabu
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vineesh Vijayan
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The State of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tahsildar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Deed no. 3264/1995, Death Certificate, Lawyer’s notice, Postal Receipt, Family Membership Certificate.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayakrishnan R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nikshitha Annie Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Vinodji
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of title over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiff has got title and right over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction to effect mutation of the property in the name of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant no.2 to 4 are directed to effect mutation of the plaint schedule property in the name of the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document proving the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the death of the plaintiff's legal predecessor.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating the legal notice served regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the postal communication regarding the case.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Family Membership Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document proving the family ties and eligibility of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Declaration of title
Case Code
Case between Remya Sabu vs Vineesh Vijayan et al regarding declaration of title and Mandatory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Remya Sabu vs Vineesh Vijayan et al regarding declaration of title and Mandatory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 11/17/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 11/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between P M Hassankutty vs M P Mohammed Ashraf regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between John Joseph et al vs Soosan Sabu et al regarding partition and separate possession.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajappan vs MuraleedharanNair et al regarding declaration and injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajappan vs MuraleedharanNair et al regarding declaration and injunction.
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thressiamma Kunjumon et al vs Pennamma Devasia et al regarding declaration and partition
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won